Order With Reasons · Small Claims Tribunal
Lahar v Lakshin Restaurant & Bar Ltd [2021] DIFC SCT 104
A reference record of SCT 104/2021, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | SCT 104/2021 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal |
| Decision | Order With Reasons |
| Before | H.E. Justice Maha Al Mheiri |
| Date | 15 June 2021 |
| Date of issue | 15 June 2021 |
| Operative orders | 2 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 11 |
| Recitals | 3 |
Parties to SCT 104/2021
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Lahar | Claimant |
| Lakshin Restaurant & Bar Ltd | Defendant |
Authorities cited in SCT 104/2021
The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.
Legislation and practice directions
- DIFC Law No. 3 of 2012 DIFC law
- Employment Law DIFC law
Other decisions citing the same authority
Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.
- SCT 262/2019 — Lulia v Leltin Investment Bank Limited (Leo as Owner and CEO) [2019] also cites DIFC Law No. 3 of 2012
- SCT 549/2019 — Loston v Liuna Market Restaurant And Lounge [2019] DIFC SCT 549 also cites DIFC Law No. 3 of 2012
- SCT 363/2019 — Kazuki v Kaprice and CO. [2019] DIFC SCT 363 also cites DIFC Law No. 3 of 2012
- SCT 359/2019 — Kyle v The Kaitlyn Investment Office [2019] DIFC SCT 359 also cites DIFC Law No. 3 of 2012
- SCT 342/2019 — Josey v Jerome [2019] DIFC SCT 342 also cites DIFC Law No. 3 of 2012
- SCT 352/2019 — Julieta v Jagger Restaurant [2019] DIFC SCT 352 also cites DIFC Law No. 3 of 2012
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a small claims tribunal matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 104/2021 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.