Judgment · Small Claims Tribunal

Kyle v The Kaitlyn Investment Office [2019] DIFC SCT 359

A reference record of SCT 359/2019, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.

Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation

At a glance

Claim numberSCT 359/2019
CourtDIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal
DecisionJudgment
BeforeSct Judge Nassir Al Nasser
Date23 October 2019
Date of issue23 October 2019
Operative orders0
Numbered paragraphs1
Recitals3

Parties to SCT 359/2019

As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.

PartyRole
KyleClaimant
/Counter-Defendant
The Kaitlyn Investment OfficeDefendant/Counter-Claimant

Sums named in the judgment

These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.

  • AED 66,259.24
  • AED 1,325.18
  • AED 77,500
  • USD 43,042
  • USD 18,042
  • USD 25,000

Authorities cited in SCT 359/2019

The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.

Legislation and practice directions

Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.

  • SCT 342/2019 — Josey v Jerome [2019] DIFC SCT 342 also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2005
  • SCT 352/2019 — Julieta v Jagger Restaurant [2019] DIFC SCT 352 also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2005
  • SCT 326/2019 — Jacenty v Jafar Middle East LLP [2019] DIFC SCT 326 also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2005
  • SCT 276/2019 — Junnia v Juss Cafe And Restaurant [2019] DIFC SCT 276 also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2005
  • SCT 240/2019 — Jugnig v Jangur Group LLC [2019] DIFC SCT 240 also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2005
  • SCT 250/2019 — Jezebel v Jie [2019] DIFC SCT 250 also cites DIFC Law No. 4 of 2005

Primary source

Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.

  • Kyle v The Kaitlyn Investment Office [2019] DIFC SCT 359 — the decision as published DIFC Courts
  • DIFC Courts judgments & orders — the register this decision is listed in DIFC Courts

Acting on a small claims tribunal matter

This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 359/2019 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.

Speak to us