Judgment · Court of Appeal

Krystal Financial Consultants LLC v Nextgen Robopark Investment LLC [2025] DIFC CA 007

A reference record of CA 007/2025, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.

Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation

At a glance

Claim numberCA 007/2025
CourtDIFC Courts — Court of Appeal
DecisionJudgment
Date24 June 2026
Date of issue16 June 2026
Operative orders3
Numbered paragraphs85
Recitals4

Parties to CA 007/2025

As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.

PartyRole
Krystal Financial Consultants LlcClaimant/Appellant
Nextgen Robopark Investment LlcDefendant/Respondent

Decisions in CA 007/2025

The DIFC Courts have published 2 decisions under this claim number. The dates and types below are the court's own record of the sequence.

DateType
16 June 2026Judgment
24 June 2026Judgment

Sums named in the judgment

These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.

  • AED 180
  • AED 813,750
  • AED 180,701.35

Authorities cited in CA 007/2025

The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.

Legislation and practice directions

  • Practice Direction No. 1 of 2023 Practice Direction

Rules of the DIFC Courts applied

RDC 1.6, RDC 44.110, RDC 44.117 — see the RDC.

Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.

  • CFI 025/2025 — CFI 025/2025 Jonathan David Sheppard v Sadapay Technologies Ltd also cites Practice Direction No. 1 of 2023
  • CFI 035/2025 — CFI 035/2025 Eli Mydlarz v Sadapay Technologies Ltd also cites Practice Direction No. 1 of 2023
  • CFI 022/2025 — CFI 022/2025 Tayseer Ali v Sadapay Technologies Ltd also cites Practice Direction No. 1 of 2023
  • CA 007/2026 — Ganesan Muthiah v Abdul Rahman Mohammad [2026] DIFC CA 007 also cites Practice Direction No. 1 of 2023

Primary source

Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.

  • Krystal Financial Consultants LLC v Nextgen Robopark Investment LLC [2025] DIFC CA 007 — the decision as published DIFC Courts
  • DIFC Courts judgments & orders — the register this decision is listed in DIFC Courts

Acting on a court of appeal matter

This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question CA 007/2025 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.

Speak to us