Judgment · Court of Appeal

Ganesan Muthiah v Abdul Rahman Mohammad [2026] DIFC CA 007

A reference record of CA 007/2026, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.

Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation

At a glance

Claim numberCA 007/2026
CourtDIFC Courts — Court of Appeal
DecisionJudgment
BeforeThe Court Of Appeal
Date14 July 2026
Date of issue14 July 2026
Operative orders5
Numbered paragraphs32
Recitals9

Parties to CA 007/2026

As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.

PartyRole
Ganesan MuthiahClaimant/Respondent
Abdul Rahman MohammadDefendant/Appellant

Sums named in the judgment

These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.

  • AED 200,000
  • AED 1,059,592
  • AED 215,633.25

Authorities cited in CA 007/2026

The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.

Legislation and practice directions

  • Practice Direction No. 1 of 2023 Practice Direction

Rules of the DIFC Courts applied

RDC 4.7 — see the RDC.

Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.

  • CA 007/2025 — Krystal Financial Consultants LLC v Nextgen Robopark Investment LLC also cites Practice Direction No. 1 of 2023
  • CFI 025/2025 — CFI 025/2025 Jonathan David Sheppard v Sadapay Technologies Ltd also cites Practice Direction No. 1 of 2023
  • CFI 035/2025 — CFI 035/2025 Eli Mydlarz v Sadapay Technologies Ltd also cites Practice Direction No. 1 of 2023
  • CFI 022/2025 — CFI 022/2025 Tayseer Ali v Sadapay Technologies Ltd also cites Practice Direction No. 1 of 2023

Primary source

Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.

  • Ganesan Muthiah v Abdul Rahman Mohammad [2026] DIFC CA 007 — the decision as published DIFC Courts
  • DIFC Courts judgments & orders — the register this decision is listed in DIFC Courts

Acting on a court of appeal matter

This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question CA 007/2026 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.

Speak to us