Order · Court of First Instance
CFI 025/2023 (1) Marko Kralj (2) Barbara Kralj v (1) Royal Vision Intelligent Fund Limited (2) Royal Vision Holding (3) Royal Vision Holding Limited (4) Royal Vision Capital (DIFC) Limited (5) Danylo Shamatava (6) Stefan Frieb
A reference record of CFI 025/2023, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | CFI 025/2023 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Court of First Instance |
| Decision | Order |
| Before | Justice Michael Black |
| Date | 6 September 2023 |
| Date of issue | 6 September 2023 |
| Operative orders | 8 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 36 |
| Recitals | 5 |
Parties to CFI 025/2023
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| (2) Barbara Kralj | Claimants |
| (6) Stefan Frieb | Defendants |
Decisions in CFI 025/2023
The DIFC Courts have published 4 decisions under this claim number. The dates and types below are the court's own record of the sequence.
| Date | Type |
|---|---|
| 14 June 2023 | Order |
| 1 September 2023 | Order |
| 1 September 2023 | Order |
| 6 September 2023 | Order |
Sums named in the order
These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.
- USD 278,934.94
- USD 276,100.00
Authorities cited in CFI 025/2023
The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.
Legislation and practice directions
- Practice Direction No. 4 of 2017 Practice Direction
Rules of the DIFC Courts applied
RDC 4.2, RDC 4.16, RDC 9.2, RDC 9.3, RDC 9.8, RDC 9.11, RDC 9.12, RDC 9.15, RDC 9.17, RDC 9.19, RDC 9.27, RDC 9.31, RDC 9.43, RDC 9.54, RDC 11.5, RDC 13.4, RDC 13.6, RDC 13.22, RDC 13.23, RDC 13.24 — see the RDC.
Other decisions citing the same authority
Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.
- CFI 033/2015 — CFI 033/2015 (1) Orion Holdings Overseas Limited (In Liquidation) (2 also cites Practice Direction No. 4 of 2017
- CFI 117/2020 — CFI 117/2020 Abena A/S v Green Gate Trading FZE also cites Practice Direction No. 4 of 2017
- CFI 069/2022 — CFI 069/2022 IDBI Bank Limited, DIFC Branch v (1) Chromeage FZE (2) also cites Practice Direction No. 4 of 2017
- CFI 054/2022 — CFI 054/2022 Eminent Trading & Services PTE. Ltd v Beaufond PLC also cites Practice Direction No. 4 of 2017
- CFI 082/2020 — CFI 082/2020 Rada Trading LLC FZC v (1) Wealth Bridge Trading Crude also cites Practice Direction No. 4 of 2017
- CFI 055/2022 — Lombard North Central PLC v R D K International LLC [2022] DIFC CFI also cites Practice Direction No. 4 of 2017
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a court of first instance matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question CFI 025/2023 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.