Order · Court of First Instance
CFI 008/2019 The National Bank of Ras Al Khaimah (P.S.C) v Mr Lakshmanan Sunil Kumar Pandarathil
A reference record of CFI-008-2019, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | CFI-008-2019 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Court of First Instance |
| Decision | Order |
| Date | 1 April 2019 |
| Date of issue | 20 March 2019 |
| Operative orders | 0 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 15 |
| Recitals | 1 |
Parties to CFI-008-2019
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| The National Bank Of Ras Al Khaimah (P.S.C) | Claimant |
| Mr Lakshmanan Sunil Kumar Pandarathil | Defendant |
Decisions in CFI-008-2019
The DIFC Courts have published 3 decisions under this claim number. The dates and types below are the court's own record of the sequence.
| Date | Type |
|---|---|
| 20 March 2019 | Judgment |
| 20 March 2019 | Order |
| 1 April 2019 | Order |
Sums named in the order
These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.
- AED 2,350,300.42
- AED 351.48
- AED 53,215.50
- AED 97,001.63
- AED 150,217.13
Authorities cited in CFI-008-2019
The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.
Legislation and practice directions
- Practice Direction No. 4 of 2017 Practice Direction
Rules of the DIFC Courts applied
RDC 4.16, RDC 9.43, RDC 13.3, RDC 13.4, RDC 13.6, RDC 13.7, RDC 13.9, RDC 13.14, RDC 13.22, RDC 13.23, RDC 13.24, RDC 15.14 — see the RDC.
Other decisions citing the same authority
Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.
- SCT 368/2018 — Jingal v Jane Fz - LLC [2018] DIFC SCT 368 also cites Practice Direction No. 4 of 2017
- SCT 221/2018 — Irelyn v (1) Iakopa (2) Ituha LLP (In Liquidation) [2018] DIFC SCT 2 also cites Practice Direction No. 4 of 2017
- SCT 175/2018 — Igete Commercial Bank (PJSC) v Ifeta [2018] DIFC SCT 175 also cites Practice Direction No. 4 of 2017
- ARB 035/2026 — ARB 035/2026 Philippina v Paola also cites Practice Direction No. 4 of 2017
- CFI 094/2024 — CFI 094/2024 Dimension B+ Ltd v Saleh Abdelkarim Hussain Abdelrahman also cites Practice Direction No. 4 of 2017
- ARB 008/2026 — ARB 008/2026 Oberlin v Ovidiu also cites Practice Direction No. 4 of 2017
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a court of first instance matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question CFI-008-2019 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.