Order With Reasons · Arbitration Division
ARB 035/2020 Mibot v Mfast
A reference record of ARB 035/2020, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: Arbitration
At a glance
| Claim number | ARB 035/2020 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Arbitration Division |
| Decision | Order With Reasons |
| Before | H.E Justice Shamlan Al Sawalehi |
| Date | 25 January 2022 |
| Date of issue | 25 January 2022 |
| Operative orders | 3 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 32 |
| Recitals | 4 |
Parties to ARB 035/2020
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Mibot | Claimant |
| Mfast | Defendant |
Sums named in the order with reasons
These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.
- AED 17,338,390.74
- AED 8,463,413
- AED 13,452,187
- AED 1,361,845
- AED 5,264,728
- AED 2,041,136
Other decisions of the same division
Records of DIFC Courts decisions heard in the same division around the same time. This decision cites no instrument we hold a record of, so these are listed by division and date rather than by shared authority.
- ARB 003/2026 — ARB 003/2026 Oliwia v Omysha
- ARB 043/2025 — ARB 043/2025 Oratio v Orangia
- ARB 008/2026 — ARB 008/2026 Oberlin v Ovidiu
- ARB 024/2025 — ARB 024/2025 Olympio v Olwin
- ARB 034/2025 — ARB 034/2025 Ohtli v Onora
- ARB 039/2025 — ARB 039/2025 Okeke v Obike
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a arbitration division matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question ARB 035/2020 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.