Order With Reasons · Arbitration Division

ARB 024/2025 Olympio v Olwin

A reference record of ARB 024/2025, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.

Where cases like this arise in our work: Arbitration

At a glance

Claim numberARB 024/2025
CourtDIFC Courts — Arbitration Division
DecisionOrder With Reasons
BeforeH.E. Chief Justice Wayne Martin
Date24 March 2026
Date of issue24 March 2026
Operative orders2
Numbered paragraphs73
Recitals10

Parties to ARB 024/2025

As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.

PartyRole
OlympioClaimant/Applicant
OlwinDefendant/Respondent

Decisions in ARB 024/2025

The DIFC Courts have published 4 decisions under this claim number. The dates and types below are the court's own record of the sequence.

DateType
7 August 2025Order
15 August 2025Order
28 August 2025Order
24 March 2026Order

Sums named in the order with reasons

These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.

  • USD 6,515,638.58
  • AED 26,511,080.13
  • AED 26,472,404.15

Authorities cited in ARB 024/2025

The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.

Rules of the DIFC Courts applied

RDC 44.5, RDC 44.19, RDC 44.117 — see the RDC.

Records of DIFC Courts decisions heard in the same division around the same time. This decision cites no instrument we hold a record of, so these are listed by division and date rather than by shared authority.

Primary source

Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.

  • ARB 024/2025 Olympio v Olwin — the decision as published DIFC Courts
  • DIFC Courts judgments & orders — the register this decision is listed in DIFC Courts

Acting on a arbitration division matter

This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question ARB 024/2025 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.

Speak to us