Order With Reasons · Arbitration Division

ARB 017/2026 Parker v Pedro

A reference record of ARB 017/2026, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.

Where cases like this arise in our work: Arbitration

At a glance

Claim numberARB 017/2026
CourtDIFC Courts — Arbitration Division
DecisionOrder With Reasons
BeforeH.E. Justice Mark Pelling
Date16 October 2026
Date of issue16 October 2026
Operative orders3
Numbered paragraphs14
Recitals3

Parties to ARB 017/2026

As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.

PartyRole
ParkerClaimant
PedroDefendant

Decisions in ARB 017/2026

The DIFC Courts have published 2 decisions under this claim number. The dates and types below are the court's own record of the sequence.

DateType
21 September 2026Order
16 October 2026Order

Sums named in the order with reasons

These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.

  • AED 53,550
  • AED 60,146.74
  • AED 38,063.23
  • AED 22,083.51
  • AED 2,820.00
  • AED 3,973.72

Authorities cited in ARB 017/2026

The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.

Rules of the DIFC Courts applied

RDC 4.51, RDC 38.17, RDC 38.40 — see the RDC.

Records of DIFC Courts decisions heard in the same division around the same time. This decision cites no instrument we hold a record of, so these are listed by division and date rather than by shared authority.

Primary source

Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.

  • ARB 017/2026 Parker v Pedro — the decision as published DIFC Courts
  • DIFC Courts judgments & orders — the register this decision is listed in DIFC Courts

Acting on a arbitration division matter

This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question ARB 017/2026 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.

Speak to us