Order With Reasons · Arbitration Division

ARB 010/2026 Paul v Paxton

A reference record of ARB 010/2026, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.

Where cases like this arise in our work: Arbitration

At a glance

Claim numberARB 010/2026
CourtDIFC Courts — Arbitration Division
DecisionOrder With Reasons
BeforeH.E. Justice Roger Stewart
Date23 September 2026
Date of issue23 September 2026
Operative orders4
Numbered paragraphs14
Recitals6

Parties to ARB 010/2026

As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.

PartyRole
PaulClaimant
PaxtonDefendant

Decisions in ARB 010/2026

The DIFC Courts have published 3 decisions under this claim number. The dates and types below are the court's own record of the sequence.

DateType
21 May 2026Order
28 July 2026Order
23 September 2026Order

Sums named in the order with reasons

These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.

  • USD 25,000
  • USD 43,505.62
  • AED 7,005.42
  • USD 2,030

Records of DIFC Courts decisions heard in the same division around the same time. This decision cites no instrument we hold a record of, so these are listed by division and date rather than by shared authority.

Primary source

Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.

  • ARB 010/2026 Paul v Paxton — the decision as published DIFC Courts
  • DIFC Courts judgments & orders — the register this decision is listed in DIFC Courts

Acting on a arbitration division matter

This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question ARB 010/2026 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.

Speak to us