Order · Arbitration Division

ARB 003/2021 (1) Murif (2) Mijul v (1) Mipy (2) Madli

A reference record of ARB 003/2021, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.

Where cases like this arise in our work: Arbitration

At a glance

Claim numberARB 003/2021
CourtDIFC Courts — Arbitration Division
DecisionOrder
BeforeH.E. Justice Nassir Al Nasser
Date21 November 2023
Date of issue21 November 2023
Operative orders2
Numbered paragraphs12
Recitals4

Parties to ARB 003/2021

As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.

PartyRole
(2) MijulClaimants/Respondents
(2) MadliDefendants/Appellants

Authorities cited in ARB 003/2021

The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.

Rules of the DIFC Courts applied

RDC 38.18, RDC 44.19 — see the RDC.

Records of DIFC Courts decisions heard in the same division around the same time. This decision cites no instrument we hold a record of, so these are listed by division and date rather than by shared authority.

Primary source

Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.

  • ARB 003/2021 (1) Murif (2) Mijul v (1) Mipy (2) Madli — the decision as published DIFC Courts
  • DIFC Courts judgments & orders — the register this decision is listed in DIFC Courts

Acting on a arbitration division matter

This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question ARB 003/2021 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.

Speak to us