Order With Reasons · Small Claims Tribunal

Pablo v Pierce [2025] DIFC SCT 321

A reference record of SCT 321/2025, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.

Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation

At a glance

Claim numberSCT 321/2025
CourtDIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal
DecisionOrder With Reasons
BeforeH.E. Justice Lim Thiam Suan
Date31 July 2026
Date of issue31 July 2026
Operative orders3
Numbered paragraphs65
Recitals8

Parties to SCT 321/2025

As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.

PartyRole
PabloClaimant/Appellant
PierceDefendant/Respondent

Sums named in the order with reasons

These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.

  • AED 71,775.70
  • AED 95,501.70
  • AED 23,726.00
  • AED 150,000.00
  • AED 20,846.00
  • AED 100

Authorities cited in SCT 321/2025

The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.

Rules of the DIFC Courts applied

RDC 4.2, RDC 53.87, RDC 53.89, RDC 53.107, RDC 53.110, RDC 53.111 — see the RDC.

Records of DIFC Courts decisions heard in the same division around the same time. This decision cites no instrument we hold a record of, so these are listed by division and date rather than by shared authority.

Primary source

Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.

  • Pablo v Pierce [2025] DIFC SCT 321 — the decision as published DIFC Courts
  • DIFC Courts judgments & orders — the register this decision is listed in DIFC Courts

Acting on a small claims tribunal matter

This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 321/2025 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.

Speak to us