Order With Reasons · Small Claims Tribunal
Nigel v Nikhil [2024] DIFC SCT 169
A reference record of SCT 169/2024, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | SCT 169/2024 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal |
| Decision | Order With Reasons |
| Before | H.E. Justice Nassir Al Nasser |
| Date | 6 June 2024 |
| Operative orders | 3 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 13 |
| Recitals | 2 |
Parties to SCT 169/2024
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Nigel | Claimant |
| Nikhil | Defendant |
Sums named in the order with reasons
These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.
- AED 489,078.11
Authorities cited in SCT 169/2024
The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.
Legislation and practice directions
- Employment Law DIFC law
Other decisions citing the same authority
Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.
- SCT 513/2023 — Nate v Nixon [2023] DIFC SCT 513 also cites Employment Law
- SCT 039/2024 — Noah v Nicole [2024] DIFC SCT 039 also cites Employment Law
- SCT 044/2024 — Noor v Neil [2024] DIFC SCT 044 also cites Employment Law
- SCT 120/2024 — Nalani v Narciso [2024] DIFC SCT 120 also cites Employment Law
- SCT 062/2024 — Neda v Natalie [2024] DIFC SCT 062 also cites Employment Law
- SCT 073/2024 — Neville v Norwood [2024] DIFC SCT 073 also cites Employment Law
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a small claims tribunal matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 169/2024 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.