Judgment · Small Claims Tribunal
Nelson v Nicolyne [2024] DIFC SCT 111
A reference record of SCT 111/2024, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | SCT 111/2024 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal |
| Decision | Judgment |
| Before | H.E. Justice Maha Al Mheiri |
| Date | 15 July 2024 |
| Date of issue | 15 July 2024 |
| Operative orders | 2 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 26 |
| Recitals | 3 |
Parties to SCT 111/2024
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Nelson | Claimant |
| Nicolyne | Defendant |
Sums named in the judgment
These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.
- AED 230,000
- AED 15,000
- AED 10,000
- AED 500,000.00
- AED 240,000
- AED 4,800
Other decisions of the same division
Records of DIFC Courts decisions heard in the same division around the same time. This decision cites no instrument we hold a record of, so these are listed by division and date rather than by shared authority.
- SCT 222/2021 — Lingan v Lajni [2021] DIFC SCT 222
- SCT 196/2021 — Linu v Laksita [2021] DIFC SCT 196
- SCT 242/2021 — Lambhit v Laghuvi [2021] DIFC SCT 242
- SCT 186/2021 — (1) Lajvati (2) Laghuvi v (1) Lankesh (2) Larraj [2021] DIFC SCT 186
- SCT 225/2021 — Lonod v Lacini [2021] DIFC SCT 225
- SCT 159/2021 — Laredo v (1) Luca (2) Lydia (3) Liliana [2021] DIFC SCT 159
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a small claims tribunal matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 111/2024 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.