Judgment · Small Claims Tribunal
Marcos v Miller [2022] DIFC SCT 001
A reference record of SCT 001/2022, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | SCT 001/2022 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal |
| Decision | Judgment |
| Before | H.E. Justice Nassir Al Nasser |
| Date | 4 February 2022 |
| Date of issue | 4 February 2022 |
| Operative orders | 4 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 33 |
| Recitals | 2 |
Parties to SCT 001/2022
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Marcos | Claimant |
| Miller | Defendant |
Sums named in the judgment
These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.
- AED 178,406.20
- AED 8,920.31
- AED 160,570.20
- AED 17,836
- AED 156,056.25
- AED 4,513.91
Other decisions of the same division
Records of DIFC Courts decisions heard in the same division around the same time. This decision cites no instrument we hold a record of, so these are listed by division and date rather than by shared authority.
- XXXX — Giang v Gigi [2016] DIFC SCT 052
- SCT 010/2016 — Gaetano v Gaia [2016] DIFC SCT 010
- xxxx — Gable LLC v Gabriela [2016] DIFC SCT 006
- SCT 019/2015 — Fatima v Fargo Group DIFC [2015] DIFC SCT 019
- SCT 020/2015 — Ferko v Fermando Limited [2015] DIFC SCT 020
- SCT 191/2015 — Ferenc v Feray [2015] DIFC SCT 191
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a small claims tribunal matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 001/2022 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.