Order With Reasons · Small Claims Tribunal

Mab Consult Fzc v Mabel Contracting Co Llc [2020] DIFC SCT 395

A reference record of SCT 395/2020, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.

Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation

At a glance

Claim numberSCT 395/2020
CourtDIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal
DecisionOrder With Reasons
BeforeSct Judge Hayley Norton
Date14 January 2021
Date of issue14 January 2021
Operative orders3
Numbered paragraphs20
Recitals3

Parties to SCT 395/2020

As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.

PartyRole
Mab Consult FzcClaimant
Mabel Contracting Co LlcDefendant

Sums named in the order with reasons

These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.

  • AED 436,900
  • AED 218,450
  • AED 114,929.10
  • AED 10,992.50

Records of DIFC Courts decisions heard in the same division around the same time. This decision cites no instrument we hold a record of, so these are listed by division and date rather than by shared authority.

Primary source

Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.

  • Mab Consult Fzc v Mabel Contracting Co Llc [2020] DIFC SCT 395 — the decision as published DIFC Courts
  • DIFC Courts judgments & orders — the register this decision is listed in DIFC Courts

Acting on a small claims tribunal matter

This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 395/2020 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.

Speak to us