Judgment · Small Claims Tribunal
Lune v Luten [2020] DIFC SCT 089
A reference record of SCT 089/2020, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | SCT 089/2020 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal |
| Decision | Judgment |
| Before | Sct Judge Maha Al Mehairi |
| Date | 30 April 2020 |
| Date of issue | 30 April 2020 |
| Operative orders | 3 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 14 |
| Recitals | 5 |
Parties to SCT 089/2020
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Lune | Claimant |
| Luten | Defendant |
Sums named in the judgment
These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.
- AED 154,357.98
- AED 7,717.91
- AED 220,000
- AED 5,481
- AED 150,857.98
- AED 3,500
Other decisions of the same division
Records of DIFC Courts decisions heard in the same division around the same time. This decision cites no instrument we hold a record of, so these are listed by division and date rather than by shared authority.
- SCT 160/2025 — Onoria v Orvil [2025] DIFC SCT 160
- SCT 133/2025 — Orphia v Orrel [2025] DIFC SCT 133
- SCT 485/2024 — Nayan v Nandika [2024] DIFC SCT 485
- SCT 256/2024 — Ouida v Oksanna [2024] DIFC SCT 256
- SCT 459/2024 — Negrete v Nazli [2024] DIFC SCT 459
- SCT 454/2024 — Oleta v Onesimo [2024] DIFC SCT 454
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a small claims tribunal matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 089/2020 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.