Judgment · Small Claims Tribunal

Luden Commercial Bank (PJSC) v Lieda [2020] DIFC SCT 086

A reference record of SCT 086/2020, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.

Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation

At a glance

Claim numberSCT 086/2020
CourtDIFC Courts — Small Claims Tribunal
DecisionJudgment
BeforeSct Judge Nassir Al Nasser
Date30 April 2020
Date of issue30 April 2020
Operative orders3
Numbered paragraphs25
Recitals6

Parties to SCT 086/2020

As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.

PartyRole
Luden Commercial Bank (Pjsc)Claimant
LiedaDefendant

Sums named in the judgment

These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.

  • AED 131,472.57
  • AED 6,573.62
  • AED 142,000
  • AED 3,683
  • AED 209,000
  • AED 5,396

Authorities cited in SCT 086/2020

The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.

Legislation and practice directions

  • Practice Direction No. 4 of 2017 Practice Direction

Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.

  • SCT 050/2020 — Lulan Commercial Bank (PJSC) v Larina [2020] DIFC SCT 050 also cites Practice Direction No. 4 of 2017
  • SCT 007/2020 — Livana Commercial Bank (PJSC) v Linod [2020] DIFC SCT 007 also cites Practice Direction No. 4 of 2017
  • SCT 018/2020 — Logan Equipment Rental v Laydia Digital (LLC) [2020] DIFC SCT 018 also cites Practice Direction No. 4 of 2017
  • SCT 554/2019 — Levis v Louisa [2019] DIFC SCT 554 also cites Practice Direction No. 4 of 2017
  • SCT 538/2019 — Lucy v Levi [2019] DIFC SCT 538 also cites Practice Direction No. 4 of 2017
  • SCT 429/2019 — Kartik Commercial Bank (PJSC) v Kurina [2019] DIFC SCT 429 also cites Practice Direction No. 4 of 2017

Primary source

Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.

  • Luden Commercial Bank (PJSC) v Lieda [2020] DIFC SCT 086 — the decision as published DIFC Courts
  • DIFC Courts judgments & orders — the register this decision is listed in DIFC Courts

Acting on a small claims tribunal matter

This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question SCT 086/2020 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.

Speak to us