Order With Reasons · Arbitration Division

Lucinethlucineth v Lutinalutina Telecom Group Ltd [2019] DIFC ARB 005

A reference record of ARB 005/2019 / ENF 066/2019 / ENF 096/2019, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.

Where cases like this arise in our work: Arbitration

At a glance

Claim numberARB 005/2019 / ENF 066/2019 / ENF 096/2019
CourtDIFC Courts — Arbitration Division
DecisionOrder With Reasons
BeforeH.E. Justice Sir Jeremy Cooke
Date8 August 2019
Date of issue8 August 2019
Operative orders1
Numbered paragraphs28
Recitals7

Parties to ARB 005/2019 / ENF 066/2019 / ENF 096/2019

As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.

PartyRole
LucinethlucinethClaimant
Lutinalutina Telecom Group LtdDefendant

Sums named in the order with reasons

These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.

  • AED 375,000

Authorities cited in ARB 005/2019 / ENF 066/2019 / ENF 096/2019

The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.

Legislation and practice directions

  • Arbitration Law DIFC law

Rules of the DIFC Courts applied

RDC 46.17 — see the RDC.

Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.

  • SCT 287/2018 — Igora Filters and Purification Devices Trading v Igan Middle East Fz also cites Arbitration Law
  • ARB-004-2016 — Chenshan Liu vs Dubai Waterfront [2016] DIFC ARB 004 also cites Arbitration Law
  • ARB 003/2017 — Pearl Petroleum Company Limited & Others v The Kurdistan Regional Go also cites Arbitration Law
  • ARB 005/2016 — Georgia Corporation v Gavino Supplies (UAE) Fze [2016] DIFC ARB 005 also cites Arbitration Law
  • XXXX — Ginette Pjsc v (1) Geary Middle East FZE (2) Geary Limited [2016] DI also cites Arbitration Law
  • CA 002/2015 — Fidel v (1) Felecia (2) Faraz [2015] DIFC CA 002 also cites Arbitration Law

Primary source

Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.

  • Lucinethlucineth v Lutinalutina Telecom Group Ltd [2019] DIFC ARB 005 — the decision as published DIFC Courts
  • DIFC Courts judgments & orders — the register this decision is listed in DIFC Courts

Acting on a arbitration division matter

This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question ARB 005/2019 / ENF 066/2019 / ENF 096/2019 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.

Speak to us