NOURA LAWYERS
Speak with a partner

Judgment · Court of First Instance

GFH Capital Limited v David Lawrence Haigh [2014] DIFC CFI 020

A reference record of CFI 020/2014, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.

Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation

At a glance

Claim numberCFI 020/2014
CourtDIFC Courts — Court of First Instance
DecisionJudgment
Date4 July 2018
Date of issue4 July 2018
Operative orders4
Numbered paragraphs75
Recitals5

Parties to CFI 020/2014

As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.

PartyRole
Gfh Capital LimitedClaimant
David Lawrence HaighDefendant

Decisions in CFI 020/2014

The DIFC Courts have published 34 decisions under this claim number. The dates and types below are the court's own record of the sequence.

DateType
12 June 2014Order
12 June 2014Order
6 August 2014Order
30 September 2014Order
30 September 2014Order
19 January 2015Order
9 February 2015Order
25 March 2015Judgment
16 April 2015Order
3 May 2015Order
14 May 2015Order
28 June 2015Order
31 August 2015Order
9 August 2016Order
9 August 2016Order
10 August 2016Order
8 September 2016Order
8 September 2016Order
10 November 2016Order
10 November 2016Decision
28 February 2017Order
28 February 2017Order
2 March 2017Order
14 March 2017Order
14 March 2017Order
16 May 2017Order
11 October 2017Order
17 October 2017Order
25 November 2017Order
11 January 2018Order
7 February 2018Order
13 June 2018Order
2 July 2018Order
4 July 2018Judgment

Sums named in the judgment

These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.

  • AED 8,735,340
  • USD 50,000
  • GBP 2,039,793.70
  • AED 185,000
  • AED 214,200
  • AED 857,000

Authorities cited in CFI 020/2014

The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.

Legislation and practice directions

Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.

  • SCT 179/2018 — Izzet v Ivory Capital Management [2018] DIFC SCT 179 also cites Employment Law
  • SCT 153/2018 — Igalico v Inteus Restaurant & Lounge [2018] DIFC SCT 153 also cites Employment Law
  • SCT 144/2018 — Isobelle v The Ieaun Restaurant [2018] DIFC SCT 144 also cites Employment Law
  • SCT 119/2018 — Idus v Iessica Ltd [2018] DIFC SCT 119 also cites Employment Law
  • SCT 113/2018 — Ifrah v Ibhan LLC [2018] DIFC SCT 113 also cites Employment Law
  • SCT 098/2018 — Ikrut v Islay Restaurant (Islay Limited) [2018] DIFC SCT 098 also cites Employment Law

Primary source

Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.

  • GFH Capital Limited v David Lawrence Haigh [2014] DIFC CFI 020 — the decision as published DIFC Courts
  • DIFC Courts judgments & orders — the register this decision is listed in DIFC Courts

Acting on a court of first instance matter

This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question CFI 020/2014 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.

Speak to us