Order · Court of First Instance
CFI 019/2009 - Order
A reference record of CFI 019/2009, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | CFI 019/2009 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Court of First Instance |
| Decision | Order |
| Date | 31 August 2009 |
| Date of issue | 31 August 2009 |
| Operative orders | 0 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 6 |
| Recitals | 4 |
Parties to CFI 019/2009
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| Morgan Stanley Private Wealth Management Limited | Claimants |
| ") Whose Registered Office In The Difc Is Located At Level 5, West Wing, The Gate, Po Box 506501, Dubai (Together The " | Claimants |
Authorities cited in CFI 019/2009
The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.
Legislation and practice directions
- Data Protection Law DIFC law
Other decisions citing the same authority
Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.
- SCT 029/2023 — Mintil v Mester [2023] DIFC SCT 029 also cites Data Protection Law
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a court of first instance matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question CFI 019/2009 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.