Order With Reasons · Court of First Instance

CFI 008/2025 Takuya Honda v (1) Shingo Okamoto (2) Muhammad Wasiq Rashid

A reference record of CFI 008/2025, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.

Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation

At a glance

Claim numberCFI 008/2025
CourtDIFC Courts — Court of First Instance
DecisionOrder With Reasons
BeforeH.E. Justice Sir Jeremy Cooke
Date27 May 2025
Date of issue27 May 2025
Operative orders6
Numbered paragraphs7
Recitals5

Parties to CFI 008/2025

As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.

PartyRole
Takuya HondaClaimant
(2) Muhammad Wasiq RashidDefendants

Sums named in the order with reasons

These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.

  • USD 1,092,425.51
  • USD 57,106.28

Records of DIFC Courts decisions heard in the same division around the same time. This decision cites no instrument we hold a record of, so these are listed by division and date rather than by shared authority.

  • CFI 078/2023 — CFI 078/2023 (1) Naazim (2) Nabeel (3) Neilson v Neville
  • CFI 043/2022 — CFI 043/2022 (1) William Allan Jones (2) Coffee Planet LLC (3) Coffe
  • CFI 004/2024 — CFI 004/2024 Skatteforvaltningen (The Danish Customs And Tax Adminis
  • CFI 056/2022 — CFI 056/2022 Fursa Consulting v Ajay Sethi Shakti Chand Sethi
  • CFI 008/2024 — CFI 008/2024 Ned v Nastasia
  • CFI 033/2024 — CFI 033/2024 Nash v Niko

Primary source

Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.

  • CFI 008/2025 Takuya Honda v (1) Shingo Okamoto (2) Muhammad Wasiq Rashid — the decision as published DIFC Courts
  • DIFC Courts judgments & orders — the register this decision is listed in DIFC Courts

Acting on a court of first instance matter

This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question CFI 008/2025 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.

Speak to us