Order · Court of First Instance
CFI 004/2013 Diwan Capital Ltd v (1) Emirates Investment & Development Co Psc (2) Ernst & Young UAE (3) Buti Saeed Mohammed Al-Ghandi (4) Abdulwahab Ahmed Al-Nakib (5) Khaled Magdy El-Marsafy (6) Evgeny Kovalishin (7) Ali Rashid Al Mazroei (8) Richard Bushman (9) Robert Bertschinger (10) Steve Burnham (11) Steffen Schubert (12) Marco G Walser (13) Harvey Palmer (14) Beat Naegeli
A reference record of CFI 004/2013, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.
Where cases like this arise in our work: DIFC Courts Litigation
At a glance
| Claim number | CFI 004/2013 |
| Court | DIFC Courts — Court of First Instance |
| Decision | Order |
| Before | Justice Sir John Chadwick |
| Date | 17 March 2016 |
| Date of issue | 17 March 2016 |
| Operative orders | 0 |
| Numbered paragraphs | 43 |
| Recitals | 3 |
Parties to CFI 004/2013
As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.
| Party | Role |
|---|---|
| (By Ra Dr A Wiederkehr And Ra Dr G Wiederkehr) | Claimant |
| (14) Beat Naegeli | Defendants |
Decisions in CFI 004/2013
The DIFC Courts have published 8 decisions under this claim number. The dates and types below are the court's own record of the sequence.
| Date | Type |
|---|---|
| 19 February 2013 | Order |
| 25 February 2013 | Order |
| 10 June 2013 | Order |
| 9 October 2013 | Order |
| 13 April 2015 | Order |
| 26 July 2015 | Order |
| 29 July 2015 | Order |
| 17 March 2016 | Order |
Sums named in the order
These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.
- USD 15,050,000
- USD 101,300
Authorities cited in CFI 004/2013
The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.
Legislation and practice directions
- DIFC Law No. 6 of 2006 DIFC law
- Companies Law DIFC law
Rules of the DIFC Courts applied
RDC 4.16, RDC 24.1 — see the RDC.
Other decisions citing the same authority
Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.
- CA-004-2015 — Investment Group Private Limited v Standard Chartered Bank [2015] DI also cites Companies Law
- CFI 007/2026 — CFI 007/2026 (1) Bimal Gandhi (2) Nishant Kaushik v (1) Muhanad Hish also cites Companies Law
- CFI 098/2023 — Mr Nancy v Narcissa DIFC [2023] DIFC CFI 098 also cites Companies Law
- CA 009/2024 — Oskar v (1) Olindo (2) Onita (3) Oron [2024] DIFC CA 009 also cites Companies Law
- SCT 198/2023 — Mishtun v Mawul [2023] DIFC SCT 198 also cites Companies Law
- SCT 064/2022 — Lucian v Lathore [2022] DIFC SCT 064 also cites Companies Law
Primary source
Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.
Acting on a court of first instance matter
This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question CFI 004/2013 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.