Order With Reasons · Arbitration Division

ARB 023/2025 Octavia v Oisin

A reference record of ARB 023/2025, drawn from the decision's own text. It sets out who the parties were, who decided it, what the decision did and where to read it. It does not summarise the court's reasoning or offer advice on it.

Where cases like this arise in our work: Arbitration

At a glance

Claim numberARB 023/2025
CourtDIFC Courts — Arbitration Division
DecisionOrder With Reasons
BeforeH.E Chief Justice Wayne Martin
Date15 August 2025
Date of issue15 August 2025
Operative orders3
Numbered paragraphs6
Recitals3

Parties to ARB 023/2025

As the decision names them, with the role each appears in.

PartyRole
OctaviaClaimant
OisinDefendant

Sums named in the order with reasons

These figures appear in the text of the decision. They are reproduced as amounts only — what each relates to is set out in the judgment itself.

  • AED 64,013.33

Authorities cited in ARB 023/2025

The decision refers to the following. They are listed as cited — what each was relied on for is set out in the decision itself.

Legislation and practice directions

  • Practice Direction No. 4 of 2017 Practice Direction

Rules of the DIFC Courts applied

RDC 36.34, RDC 38.8 — see the RDC.

Records of other DIFC Courts decisions that cite at least one of the same instruments. Shared authority is not shared reasoning — each decision turns on its own facts.

  • CFI 064/2022 — CFI 064/2022 Union Insurance Company PJSC v International Precious M also cites Practice Direction No. 4 of 2017
  • CFI 063/2024 — CFI 063/2024 Istar Capital Limited v Audacia Capital Limited also cites Practice Direction No. 4 of 2017
  • ARB 011/2025 — ARB 011/2025 Naidoo and (1) Nofret v (2) Nandini (3) Nurine (4) Nadi also cites Practice Direction No. 4 of 2017
  • CFI 077/2022 — CFI 077/2022 ASW Hospitality AG v MAG Of Life FZ-LLC also cites Practice Direction No. 4 of 2017
  • CA 015/2024 — CA 015/2024 Nael v Niamh also cites Practice Direction No. 4 of 2017
  • SCT 365/2024 — Nuruddin v Nihaal [2024] DIFC SCT 365 also cites Practice Direction No. 4 of 2017

Primary source

Everything on this page comes from the decision itself. The link goes to the court that issued it.

  • ARB 023/2025 Octavia v Oisin — the decision as published DIFC Courts
  • DIFC Courts judgments & orders — the register this decision is listed in DIFC Courts

Acting on a arbitration division matter

This page is a record, not advice. If a matter of your own turns on the kind of question ARB 023/2025 dealt with, speak to us about the facts.

Speak to us